You are here

  • Home
  • Online First
  • Reporting and methodological quality of studies that use Mendelian randomisation in UK Biobank: a meta-epidemiological study

Article info

Article menu
Original research
Reporting and methodological quality of studies that use Mendelian randomisation in UK Biobank: a meta-epidemiological study

Authors

  • Mark J Gibson MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU), University of Bristol, Bristol, UKSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Francesca Spiga MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU), University of Bristol, Bristol, UKBristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Amy Campbell MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU), University of Bristol, Bristol, UKSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Jasmine N Khouja MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU), University of Bristol, Bristol, UKSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Rebecca C Richmond MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU), University of Bristol, Bristol, UKBristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Marcus R Munafò MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU), University of Bristol, Bristol, UKSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  1. Correspondence to Mark J Gibson, MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU), University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TH, UK; mark.gibson{at}bristol.ac.uk
View Full Text

Citation

Gibson MJ, Spiga F, Campbell A, et al
Reporting and methodological quality of studies that use Mendelian randomisation in UK Biobank: a meta-epidemiological study
BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine Published Online First: 08 December 2022. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112006

Publication history

  • Accepted November 20, 2022
  • First published December 8, 2022.

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Copyright information

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.