Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Radical prostatectomy reduced death from prostate cancer but not all cause mortality

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


 
 QUESTION: In men with early prostate cancer, is watchful waiting as effective as radical prostatectomy?

Design

Randomised (allocation concealed*), blinded {outcome assessors, data analysts, and monitoring committee},* controlled trial with median 6.2 years of follow up (Scandinavian Prostatic Cancer Group Study Number 4 [SPCG-4]).

Setting

14 centres in Sweden, Finland, and Iceland.

Patients

698 men <75 years of age with newly diagnosed prostate cancer and tumour stage T0d, T1, or T2. Patients with other cancers or signs of metastases were excluded. 695 men (mean age 65 y) had complete follow up.

Intervention

Patients were allocated to radical prostatectomy (n=347) or watchful waiting (n=348). Adjuvant treatment was not given. For local progression, prostatectomy group patients received orchidectomy or gonadotropin releasing hormone analogues and some watchful waiting group patients received transurethral resection.

Main outcome measures

Death from prostate cancer, distant metastases, local progression, and overall mortality. A subsequent follow up study assessed …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • For correspondence: Dr A Bill-Axelson, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden. annabill-axelson{at}urology.uas.lul.se and Dr G Steineck, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. gunnar.steineck{at}onkpat.ki.se

  • Source of funding: Swedish Cancer Society.

  • *See glossary.

  • †Information provided by author.