TY - JOUR T1 - Making sense of diagnostic tests likelihood ratios JF - Evidence Based Medicine JO - Evid Based Med SP - 130 LP - 131 DO - 10.1136/ebm.11.5.130-a VL - 11 IS - 5 AU - Rafael Perera AU - Carl Heneghan Y1 - 2006/10/01 UR - http://ebm.bmj.com/content/11/5/130.2.abstract N2 - 
 A smart mother makes often a better diagnosis than a poor doctor.
 August Bier German, professor of surgery 1861–1949. Statistical diagnosis is a mystery to many health practitioners.1 Information is often presented as test accuracy (sensitivity and specificity). However, at the bedside we need to know how a test result predicts the diagnosis or outcome of interest. Attempts to demystify approaches to diagnosis include the construction of 2 by 2 boxes, nomograms, and rules such as SpPin (with a Specific test the Positive Rules in) and SnNout (with a Sensitive test the Negative Rules out). In our teachings of evidence-based medicine, we have found an easier, intuitive way to interpret the results of diagnostic studies based on 2 elements: the likelihood ratio of the test and the pretest odds. The likelihood ratio (LR) summarises information about the diagnostic test by combining information about the sensitivity and specificity. It tells you how much a positive or negative result changes … ER -