TY - JOUR T1 - Maternal and neonatal outcomes in nulliparous women undergoing non-medically indicated induction of labour or expectant management at 38–41 weeks gestation JF - Evidence Based Medicine JO - Evid Based Med SP - 114 LP - 114 DO - 10.1136/ebmed-2015-110177 VL - 20 IS - 3 AU - Kelly S Gibson Y1 - 2015/06/01 UR - http://ebm.bmj.com/content/20/3/114.abstract N2 - Commentary on: Bailit JL, Grobman W, Zhao Y, et al, ; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Network. Nonmedically indicated induction vs expectant treatment in term nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;212:103.e1–7OpenUrlCrossRef.In the last decade, our understanding of the associations connected with induction of labour have greatly improved as the conventional comparisons with spontaneous labour have been replaced with the appropriate alternative of expectant management.1 Starting with smaller single site studies,2 followed by administrative databases3 ,4 and with validated databases now abstracted directly from medical records,5 multiple studies showed no association or a decrease in caesarean delivery with induction, as well as a decreased risk for some … ER -