TY - JOUR T1 - Network meta-analysis for diagnostic tests JF - BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine JO - BMJ EBM SP - 192 LP - 193 DO - 10.1136/bmjebm-2019-111179 VL - 24 IS - 5 AU - Jack W O’Sullivan Y1 - 2019/10/01 UR - http://ebm.bmj.com/content/24/5/192.abstract N2 - Network meta-analysis (NMA) has enabled the comparison of numerous interventions in the absence of direct head-to-head randomised controlled trials. A new technique describes NMA for diagnostic tests, an approach that can facilitate a similar comparison between different diagnostic tests at different diagnostic thresholds. Globally, the provision of healthcare is aided by clinical practice guidelines.1 Healthcare organisations, such as the UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), routinely provide healthcare workers with advice about what works for which patients in which particular setting.To do this, NICE, as does the WHO and various American professional societies, conducts systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the available evidence. The recent methodological creation of NMA has enabled these organisations to explicitly compare the effectiveness of different interventions even if they have not been directly compared in the same randomised controlled trial. NMA has facilitated organisations to determine, for instance, that apixaban 5 mg twice daily is the most efficacious novel oral anticoagulant ‘for … ER -