TY - JOUR T1 - Online supplementation for teaching evidence-based medicine: feasibility of a randomised-controlled trial JF - BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine JO - BMJ EBM SP - 254 LP - 254 DO - 10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111372 VL - 26 IS - 5 AU - Marcy C McCall AU - Thomas R Fanshawe AU - David McCartney AU - Damion Young AU - David Nunan AU - Carl Heneghan Y1 - 2021/10/01 UR - http://ebm.bmj.com/content/26/5/254.abstract N2 - Background and Objectives As teaching technology advances, medical education is increasingly using digital mediums and exploring instructional models such as the flipped classroom and blended learning courses, where the in-class taught sessions are more groups on content delivered before class. Early evidence suggests lectures and foundational material can be equally provided online, but we have low-quality research to be convinced. We aim to test and develop an online evidence-based teaching resource that seeks to improve the availability and scalability of evidence-based medicine (EBM) learning tools. We evaluate the feasibility of a study design that could test for changes in academic performance in EBM skills using an online supplement.Methods Mixed-methods feasibility study of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) in an undergraduate medical student cohort.Results Of a small cohort (n=34), eight participants agreed to randomisation and completed the study. No study participant completed the EBM supplementary course in full. Students report time-management as a significant barrier in participation, and all aspects of the study and communications should be delivered with efficiency a key consideration.Conclusion Randomising students to an online EBM supplement within a medical school programme presents challenges of recruitment and student motivation, but the study design is potentially feasible.Data are available upon reasonable request. Contact medical statistician Thomas Fanshawe for deidentified participant data at: thomas.fanshawe@phc.ax.ac.uk ER -