Table 3

Results of the bivariate meta-analyses: pooled sensitivity and specificity with 95% CI (created by the authors)

Test evaluations included in analysis (n)Paediatric study participants included in analysis (n)Sensitivity
(95% CI)
Specificity
(95% CI)
All studies17628764.2 (57.4 to 70.5)99.1 (98.2 to 99.5)
Subgroup analysis
(a) Symptom status
 - symptomatic population13340771.8 (63.6 to 78.8)98.7 (96.6 to 99.5)
 - asymptomatic population10243156.2 (47.6 to 64.4)98.6 (97.3 to 99.3)
 - mixed population341963.4 (37.3 to 83.5)98.7 (90.8 to 99.8)
(b) Setting
 - community testing site8268064.1 (54.7 to 72.6)98.7 (97.6 to 99.3)
 - hospital test centre/emergency department9360764.1 (53.8 to 73.2)99.4 (98.2 to 99.8)
(c) Sample type (index test)
 - nasopharyngeal10350564.3 (54.7 to 73.0)99.4 (98.5 to 99.8)
 - not nasopharyngeal7278264.6 (54.4 to 73.7)98.5 (96.7 to 99.3)
(d) Sample type (reference standard)
 - nasopharyngeal11367065.4 (56.3 to 73.5)99.1 (97.7 to 99.7)
 - not nasopharyngeal6261764.2 (53.1 to 74.0)98.9 (97.6 to 99.5)
(e) RT-PCR positivity threshold
 - Ct cut-off value=255206292.4 (72.7 to 98.2)92.7 (85.4 to 96.5)
 - Ct cut-off value=306227183.3 (63.9 to 93.4)96.1 (91.8 to 98.2)
(f) Publication status
 - preprint5123563.2 (55.6 to 70.3)98.9 (95.9 to 99.7)
 - peer reviewed12505264.3 (54.8 to 72.7)99.1 (98.1 to 99.6)
  • Ct, cycle threshold; RT-PCR, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction.