Original risk of bias tool | RoB 2 | |
Focus of assessment | Outcome level, for example, subjective and objective outcomes should be assessed separately (however, in practice, this tool has often been used at the study level) | Result level, such that a numerical result is specified as the focus of the assessment (if there is no numerical result for an outcome from a specific study, then there is no need to complete a risk of bias assessment as it will not be contributing to the review) |
Structure | Seven recommended bias domains, with the option of adding or deleting domains Risk of bias judgement for each domain only | Preliminary considerations Five fixed bias domains Signalling questions Risk of bias judgement for each domain and overall |
Domains |
|
|
Basis of judgement | Author derived | Signalling questions answered yes; probably yes; probably no; no; no information with suggested algorithm for reaching judgement |
Judgement options | Low risk—unclear—high risk | Low risk—some concerns—high risk (plus optional direction of bias) |
Guidance for using the original risk of bias tool is available in V.5.2 of the Cochrane Handbook.
*As RoB 2 assesses risk of bias in a numerical result, risk of bias due to missing results (from non-publication of trials or results) is not part of the revised tool. This can be assessed using the Risk of Bias-Missing Evidence; available on the Risk of Bias tools website (https://www.riskofbias.info/welcome/rob-me-tool).
†RoB 2 does not include an ‘other bias’ domain. All domains within RoB 2 include trial features that directly influence the risk of bias; those that indirectly influence the risk of bias should be assessed in other stages of the review, or example,for conflicts of interest a Tool for Addressing Conflicts of Interest in Trials is in development.16
RoB2, Risk of Bias 2.