Table 4

Explanation of different types of spin and tips on how to avoid them

Type of spinExplanationHow to avoid
Focus on statistically significant effects for within-group comparisonsHighlighting significant improvements from baseline in the intervention group, without acknowledging the lack of difference in effect between groupsFocus on between-group effects, even if they are not statistically significant
Focus on statistically significant effects for secondary outcomesUsing statistically significant intervention effects on secondary outcomes to highlight the benefit of an intervention without acknowledging non-significant effects on the primary outcome(s)Focus on between-group effects for the primary outcome(s), even if they are not statistically significant
Focus on statistically significant effects for subgroup analysesUsing statistically significant intervention effects in a subgroup of the study population to highlight the benefit of an intervention without acknowledging non-significant effects in the primary population of interestFocus on between-group effects for the primary outcome(s) in the primary population of interest, even if the effects are not statistically significant
Focus on statistically significant effects for modified population of analyses (eg, intention to treat analyses)Using statistically significant intervention effects in per-protocol analyses to highlight the benefit of an intervention without acknowledging non-significant effects in the intention to treat analyses.Focus on between-group effects from the intention to treat analyses, even if they are not statistically significant
Interpret statistically non-significant effects for the primary outcome(s) as showing treatment equivalence or comparable effectivenessStating that both the intervention and control intervention were beneficial despite a non-significant between-group effect on the primary outcomeDo not report that an intervention was effective if the between-group difference was not statistically significant
Highlighting the benefit of an intervention despite statistically non-significant effectsHighlighting differences in outcome values between the intervention and control without acknowledging there was no statistically significant difference between these values. Infographics often did this through a figure that displayed a difference in outcome values between groups, without mentioning the non-significant p valuePresent differences in outcome values with accompanying effect sizes and measures of precision
Focus on statistically significant effects for one primary outcome while ignoring non-statistically significant effects for other primary outcomesUsing statistically significant intervention effects for one primary outcome to highlight the benefit of the intervention without acknowledging non-significant effects for other primary outcomesMention between-group effects for all primary outcome(s), even if some are not statistically significant
Focus on statistically significant effects for the primary outcome at a non-primary time-pointUsing statistically significant intervention effects for the primary outcome at a non-primary time point (eg, 8 weeks) to highlight the benefit of the intervention without acknowledging non-significant effects at the primary time-point (eg, 4 months) (when a primary time point is specified)Focus on between-group effects for the primary time point, even if it was not statistically significant
Focus on statistically significant effects for the primary outcome at one time point while ignoring non-statistically significant effects for the primary outcome at other time points (when no primary time point is specified)Using statistically significant intervention effects for the primary outcome at some time points to highlight the benefit of the intervention without acknowledging non-significant effects at other time pointsAcknowledge when between-group effects for a primary outcome were significant at some time points but not others