Skip to main content
Log in

To test or not to test — To treat or not to treat

The decision-threshold approach to patient management

  • Perspectives
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The inability to consider explicitly factors that should enter into clinical judgment compromises physician efforts to make cost-effective decisions regarding diagnostic testing and treatment. The authors describe the decision-threshold approach, a decision-analysis strategy that helps physicians identify an optimal test-treatment decision based upon the prior probability of disease, the characteristics of the test (sensitivity, specificity, risk), and the benefits/costs of treatment. They also present a microcomputer graphics program that makes the decision-threshold approach readily available to physicians.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Griner PF, Mayewski RJ, Mushlin AI, Greenland P. Selection and interpretation of diagnostic tests and procedures. Ann Intern Med 1981;94:553–600

    Google Scholar 

  2. Griner PF, Glaser RJ. Misuse of laboratory tests and diagnostic procedures. N Engl J Med 1982;307:1336–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pauker SG, Kassirer JP. Therapeutic decision making: a cost-benefit analysis. N Engl J Med 1975;293:229–34

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pauker SG, Kassirer JP. The threshold approach to clinical decision making. N Engl J Med 1980;302:1109–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Doubilet P. A mathematical approach to interpretation and selection of diagnostic tests. Med Decis Making 1983;3:177–95

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Eeckhout LR, Lebrun TC. Sailly JCL. The informative content of diagnostic tests: an economic analysis. Social Sci Med 1984;18:873–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Eraker SA, Sasse L. The serum digoxin test and digoxin toxicity: a bayesian approach to decision making. Circulation 1981;64:409–20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Weinstein MC, Fineberg HV, Elstein AS, et al. Clinical decision analysis. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company. 1980

    Google Scholar 

  9. Keeney RL, Raiffa H. Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eraker SA. Politser P. How decisions are reached: physician and patient. Ann Intern Med 1982;97:262–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Beller GA, Smith TW, Abelmann WH, Haber E, Hood WB Jr. Digitalis intoxication: a prospective clinical study with serum level correlations. N Engl J Med 1971;284:989–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Greenes RA, Cain KC, Begg CB. Patient-oriented performance measures of diagnostic tests. Met Decis Making 1984;4:7–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received from the Department of Internal Medicine, VA Medical Center and Medical School, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, the Faculte Catholique de Mons, Belgium, and the Centre de Recherchese Economiques. Sociologiques et de Gestion, Lille, France.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eraker, S.A., Eeckhoudt, L.R., Vanbutsele, R.J.M. et al. To test or not to test — To treat or not to treat. J Gen Intern Med 1, 177–182 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02602334

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02602334

Key words

Navigation