The accuracy of clinical examination of injury of the knee joint
References (9)
- et al.
Knee ligament injuries—a diagnostic and therapeutic approach
Orthop. Clin. North Am.
(1977) - et al.
Ligamentous restraints to anterior-posterior drawer in the human knee
J. Bone Joint Surg.
(1980) - et al.
Medial collateral ligament injuries of the knee
Clin. Orthop.
(1978) - et al.
Findings at arthroscopy and arthrography in knee injuries
Acta Orthop. Scand.
(1978)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (56)
Clinical, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Arthroscopic Correlation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Meniscal Injuries of the Knee
2018, Journal of Orthopaedics, Trauma and RehabilitationCitation Excerpt :There seems to be disagreement regarding the answer to this question. Investigations support the fact that the accuracy of clinical examination compared with arthroscopic findings ranges between 64% and 85%.19,20 Rose and Gold9 found that clinical examination is as accurate as MRI in diagnosing meniscal tears and ACL ruptures, so they concluded that MRI, because of its high cost, is not necessary in patients with clinical suspicion of meniscus and cruciate ligament tears.
Diagnostic accuracy of history taking and physical examination for assessing anterior cruciate ligament lesions of the knee in primary care
2010, Archives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationSports-Related Injuries of the Knee: An Approach to MRI Interpretation
2006, Clinics in Sports MedicinePhysical examination of the knee: A review of the original test description and scientific validity of common orthopedic tests
2003, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Copyright © 1984 Published by Elsevier Ltd.