Elsevier

Injury

Volume 16, Issue 2, 1984, Pages 96-101
Injury

The accuracy of clinical examination of injury of the knee joint

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(84)80007-8Get rights and content

Summary

This study is an analysis of the clinical examination of 118 consecutive patients with severe, acute injury of the knee joint, that is, with intra-articular effusion or with clinical suspicion of ligamentous instability. Both the clinical examination and the examination under anaesthesia for ligamentous instability involve a large number of falsely positive and falsely negative diagnoses. The greatest uncertainty is attached to the examination of the anterior cruciate ligament and menisci. The diagnostic specificity and the diagnostic sensitivity of the clinical examination of the anterior cruciate ligament are 0·75 and 0·62 respectively. The corresponding values for examinations under anaesthesia are 0·86 and 0·76 respectively.

Two-thirds of the patients without intra-articular effusion, whose clinical examination gives rise to suspicion of ligamentous instability, however, have subclinical intra-articular haemorrhage and have as many cruciate and combined lesions as the whole series, viz. respectively 63 and 47 per cent. On the basis of this we conclude that arthroscopy should be carried out in all patients with a traumatic haemarthrosis or indication of ligamentous instability.

References (9)

  • MarshallJ.L. et al.

    Knee ligament injuries—a diagnostic and therapeutic approach

    Orthop. Clin. North Am.

    (1977)
  • ButlerD.L. et al.

    Ligamentous restraints to anterior-posterior drawer in the human knee

    J. Bone Joint Surg.

    (1980)
  • FettoJ.F. et al.

    Medial collateral ligament injuries of the knee

    Clin. Orthop.

    (1978)
  • GillquistJ. et al.

    Findings at arthroscopy and arthrography in knee injuries

    Acta Orthop. Scand.

    (1978)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (56)

  • Clinical, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Arthroscopic Correlation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Meniscal Injuries of the Knee

    2018, Journal of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Rehabilitation
    Citation Excerpt :

    There seems to be disagreement regarding the answer to this question. Investigations support the fact that the accuracy of clinical examination compared with arthroscopic findings ranges between 64% and 85%.19,20 Rose and Gold9 found that clinical examination is as accurate as MRI in diagnosing meniscal tears and ACL ruptures, so they concluded that MRI, because of its high cost, is not necessary in patients with clinical suspicion of meniscus and cruciate ligament tears.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text