Elsevier

Physiology & Behavior

Volume 79, Issue 3, August 2003, Pages 409-416
Physiology & Behavior

The physiology of marriage: pathways to health

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9384(03)00160-4Get rights and content

Abstract

Marriage is the central relationship for most adults and has beneficial effects for health. At the same time, troubled marriages have negative health consequences. This review outlines the physiological pathways through which marital relationships influence health based on a stress/social support model. In addition, we review recent findings suggesting that unhappy marriages are associated with morbidity and mortality. We then turn to studies of marital interaction that include assessment of physiological pathways through which marital functioning influences health: the cardiovascular, endocrine, and immune systems. Across these studies, negative and hostile behaviors during marital conflict discussions are related to elevations in cardiovascular activity, alterations in hormones related to stress, and dysregulation of immune function. Using recent conceptualizations of the physiological impact of chronic stress, we illustrate how physiological changes associated with marital functioning in these studies have long-term implications for health outcomes. Finally, we discuss future implications of current research for understanding the relationships among marital functioning, physiology, and health.

Introduction

For humans and a wide variety of animal species, social relationships have important physiological consequences, often with implications for health [1], [2]. Social relationships are also important contributors to health and well-being. Epidemiological studies suggest that social isolation is a major risk factor for morbidity and mortality, comparable to well-established health risk factors such as cigarette smoking, blood pressure, blood lipids, obesity, and physical activity [3]. Although both the quality and quantity of social ties have been related to morbidity and mortality, the support provided by certain relationships may be more important than others. The central relationship for most adults is marriage; 56% of adults in the United States are married and living with their spouse [4].

Across a number of surveys, married individuals report greater happiness and life satisfaction [5] and have a lower risk of depression [6] than their unmarried counterparts. Moreover, findings from the National Longitudinal Mortality Study illustrate the scope of impact that marital status has on mortality [7]. Across all causes of mortality and across different nonmarried populations (never married, divorced/separated, and widowed), nonmarried individuals had elevated rates of mortality compared to married individuals. Although elevated risk was observed for cardiovascular disease and cancer, significant risk was also observed for other causes, notably pneumonia and influenza, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and liver disease and cirrhosis. The relationship between marital status and mortality exhibits a generally consistent pattern in longitudinal studies, with marital status affording greater protection from mortality for men compared to women (50% higher among women, 250% higher among men [8], [9], [10]).

What are the processes by which marriage promotes health and well-being? Several explanations have been proposed, including cohabitation, economic well-being, and social support [10]. Research supports the two latter explanations, as cohabiting adults are more likely to report poorer health than married adults [11], and are as likely to report distress as adults living alone [12]. In terms of economic well-being, married persons have higher median household incomes than the nonmarried (US$54,300 vs. US$23,400 [13]), but after controlling for income, married persons still have lower rates of mortality than nonmarried persons [7].

The prevailing explanatory framework proposed to account for the protective benefits of marriage is the stress/social support hypothesis, which accounts for both protective and deleterious health correlates of marriage [14]. Stress and support in the marital relationship influence health status through a number of pathways. These include influences on the marital relationship itself, on the individual's cognitions, emotions or affect, health-related behaviors, coping behaviors, and physiology [14], [15].

This paper focuses on physiological pathways through which marital relationships influence health. In addition to informing marriage and health research, studies of marriage and physiology offer important insights into biobehavioral aspects of human social relationships. We briefly review recent evidence of the health consequences of marital relationships, with a focus on consequences of distressed and unhappy marriages, as negative aspects of marital functioning have traditionally received greater emphasis compared to positive aspects. We then turn to physiological pathways through which marital functioning influences health: the cardiovascular, endocrine, and immune systems [2]. Evidence for the influence of marital functioning on physiological pathways is primarily derived from paradigms used by marital interaction researchers. Finally, we discuss future implications of current research for understanding the relationships among marital functioning, physiology, and health.

Section snippets

Marital strain and health outcomes

Burman and Margolin [14] termed their explanatory framework as the stress/social support hypothesis, noting that marital factors may be a source of stress. Distressed marriages are a major source of stress, and in general, unhappily married persons are worse off in well-being than unmarried persons [16]. Given the centrality of the marital relationship for most adults, it is likely that marital stress would have consequences for physical health as well.

Several prospective longitudinal studies

Physiological pathways

In their stress/social support framework, Burman and Margolin [14] proposed several interrelated pathways from marital status to health, including interpersonal mediators, intraindividual variables, psychological processes, coping strategies, and physiological consequences. In their review of more recent research on marriage and health, Kiecolt-Glaser and Newton [15] refined this model, focusing on affective, behavioral, and physiological pathways from marital factors to health outcomes. There

Physiological responses and health

The past decade of research has yielded important evidence for the influence of behaviors during marital interaction on physiological functioning, providing solid, mechanistic evidence of how marital functioning can have direct physiological consequences. Cardiovascular, endocrine, and immune pathways are critically important for the organism's adaptation to changing environmental demands. Thus, they play a central role in the ability of the organism to maintain physiological stability through

Conclusion

This review described relationships between marital functioning and health outcomes, and the physiological pathways that may mediate these relationships. In particular, evidence from marital interaction studies suggests that marital strain has deleterious effects on cardiovascular, endocrine, and immune functions. Marital strain can be viewed as a repeated, perhaps even chronic, social stressor. As such, in spouses who fail to physiologically recover following a marital disagreement, or fail to

Acknowledgements

Work on this paper was supported by grants K02 MH01467, P01 AG16321, MO1-RR-00034, and an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship to the first author.

References (73)

  • T.N. Bradbury et al.

    Longitudinal study of marital interaction and dysfunction: review and analysis

    Clin. Psychol. Rev.

    (1993)
  • J.K. Kiecolt-Glaser et al.

    Methodological issues in behavioral immunology research with humans

    Brain Behav. Immun.

    (1988)
  • J.T. Cacioppo et al.

    Multilevel integrative analyses of human behavior: social neuroscience and the complementing nature of social and biological approaches

    Psychol. Bull.

    (2000)
  • B.N. Uchino et al.

    The relationship between social support and physiological processes: a review with emphasis on underlying mechanisms and implications for health

    Psychol. Bull.

    (1996)
  • J.S. House et al.

    Social relationships and health

    Science

    (1988)
  • T.A. Lugaila

    Marital status and living arrangements: March 1998 (Update)

    Fertility and Family Statistics Branch

    (1998)
  • A. Mastekaasa

    Marital status, distress, and well-being: an international comparison

    J. Comp. Fam. Stud.

    (1994)
  • L. Robins et al.

    Psychiatric disorders in America

    (1991)
  • E. Litwak et al.

    Organizational theory, social supports, and mortality rates: a theoretical convergence

    Am. Sociol. Rev.

    (1989)
  • L.F. Berkman et al.

    Health and ways of living: the Alameda county study

    (1983)
  • C.E. Ross et al.

    The impact of the family on health: the decade in review

    J. Marriage Fam.

    (1990)
  • M.M. Hughes et al.

    Living alone, social integration, and mental health

    Am. J. Sociol.

    (1981)
  • U.S. Census Bureau CPR

    Money income in the United States: 1998

    (1999)
  • B. Burman et al.

    Analysis of the association between marital relationships and health problems: an interactional perspective

    Psychol. Bull.

    (1992)
  • J.K. Kiecolt-Glaser et al.

    Marriage and health: his and hers

    Psychol. Bull.

    (2001)
  • J.C. Coyne et al.

    Going beyond social support: the role of social relationships in adaptation

    J. Consult. Clin. Psychol.

    (1986)
  • K.A.S. Wickrama et al.

    Marital quality and physical illness: a latent growth curve analysis

    J. Marriage Fam.

    (1997)
  • P.L. Kimmel et al.

    Dyadic relationship conflict, gender, and mortality in urban hemodialysis patients

    J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.

    (2000)
  • K. Orth-Gomer et al.

    Marital stress worsens prognosis in women with coronary heart disease

    JAMA

    (2000)
  • T.W. Smith et al.

    Psychosocial influences on the development and course of coronary heart disease: current status and implications for research and practice

    J. Consult. Clin. Psychol.

    (2002)
  • R.E. Heyman

    Observation of couple conflicts: clinical assessment applications, stubborn truths, and shaky foundations

    Psychol. Assess.

    (2001)
  • K.A. McGonagle et al.

    The frequency and determinants of marital disagreements in a community sample

    J. Soc. Pers. Relatsh.

    (1992)
  • G. Margolin et al.

    Home observations of married couples reenacting naturalistic conflicts

    Behav. Assess.

    (1989)
  • F.D. Fincham et al.

    Conflict in marriage: implications for working with couples

    Annu. Rev. Psychol.

    (1999)
  • M.A. Morell et al.

    Affect expression, marital satisfaction, and stress reactivity among premenopausal women during a conflictual marital discussion

    Psychol. Women Q.

    (1990)
  • C.K. Ewart et al.

    High blood pressure and marital discord: not being nasty matters more than being nice

    Health Psychol.

    (1991)
  • Cited by (548)

    • Marriage, romantic relationships, and health

      2023, Encyclopedia of Mental Health, Third Edition: Volume 1-3
    • Adult Social Relationships in Primates

      2024, Masterclass in Neuroendocrinology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text