Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Angioplasty at an invasive treatment centre reduced mortality compared with first contact thrombolysis
Free

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


 
 Q Is the transfer of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) to an invasive treatment centre (ITC) for primary angioplasty (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]) more effective than onsite fibrinolysis for reducing all cause mortality, reinfarction, or stroke?

Clinical impact ratings GP/FP/Primary care ★★★★★☆☆ IM/Ambulatory care ★★★★★★☆ Internal medicine ★★★★★★☆ Cardiology ★★★★★☆☆ Emergency medicine ★★★★★★☆

METHODS

Embedded ImageDesign:

randomised controlled trial (Danish trial in Acute Myocardial Infarction-2 [DANAMI-2]).

Embedded ImageAllocation:

concealed.*

Embedded ImageBlinding:

blinded (outcome assessors).*

Embedded ImageFollow up period:

30 days.

Embedded ImageSetting:

24 referral hospitals (RHPs) and 5 ITCs in Denmark.

Embedded ImagePatients:

1572 patients ⩾18 years age (median age 63 y, 73% men) who had STEMI. Exclusion criteria included contraindication to fibrinolysis and left bundle branch block.

Embedded ImageIntervention:

patients were stratified by hospital and allocated to PCI (n = 567 at RHPs and 223 at ITCs) or fibrinolysis (n = 562 at …

View Full Text

Linked Articles

  • Glossary
    BMJ Publishing Group Ltd