Article info
PDFResearch methods and reporting
Pragmatic and open science-based solution to a current problem in the reporting of living systematic reviews
- Correspondence to Maria-Inti Metzendorf, Institute of General Practice, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine University, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, 40225 Dusseldorf, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany; maria-inti.metzendorf{at}med.uni-duesseldorf.de
Citation
Pragmatic and open science-based solution to a current problem in the reporting of living systematic reviews
Publication history
- Accepted October 25, 2022
- First published November 9, 2022.
Online issue publication
July 21, 2023
Article Versions
- Previous version (21 July 2023).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.